Dan McCombie is a Research Associate at Larisa Ortiz Associates
I caught myself typing this into my google machine the other day:
I caught myself typing this into my google machine the other day:
“Are shipping containers still cool?”
This question has been on my mind as of late, given that the
phenomenon of turning shipping containers into pop-ups for retail, exhibition
space, offices, and even tiny homes, has been going on for quite some time now.
Many people are no doubt familiar with the well renowned downtown Container Park in Las Vegas,
constructed in 2013 as part of a huge reinvestment package spurred by the
relocation of online retailer Zappos to the neighborhood. And I personally
remember when back in 2011 my hometown of Christchurch (NZ) had its central
city devastated by earthquake, spurring the city to create Re:Start to quickly breathe life back into
the CBD. Are people still doing this?
Is it still perceived as both a savvy marketing scheme and opportunity to
catalyze revitalization? Or is the public starting to experience
container-fatigue?
What’s the problem
with containers?
Admittedly, there is a part of me that sometimes looks upon
containers with disdain simply because they are so ubiquitous now. But I
stumbled upon this quote from an
article by John King in an article he wrote for SFGATE.com, wherein he waxes
on the creation of “Proxy,” another container
park constructed in 2011 in the Hayes Valley neighborhood of San Francisco:
“This isn’t about architecture so much as urban place
making: you’re less aware of the structures than of the surroundings. The
containers aren’t treated as sculptural elements, as is the case recently in
other international cities. They’re content to add layers to the landscape,
enlarging the Hayes Valley experience without making a fuss.”
Which I interpret to mean: “Calm down. Forget about the
medium and consider the effect.”
And rightly so. I actually visited Proxy when I was last in
San Francisco, when a couple of friends brought me to the beer garden there (Biergarten).
Recalling that visit and doing some background research, I learned that Proxy
was exactly as the name describes—a temporary placeholder until more permanent
development could take place, much like Re:Start in Christchurch. The site on
Octavia Street was originally an underutilized parking lot that the city sought
to redevelop for affordable housing. However, the original plan was tabled with
the advent of the economic recession. Rather than let the site lay vacant and
an eyesore on the neighborhood, the city and the Mayor’s office bid the site
out for a temporary and less costly installation, to which the
designer/developer/operator Envelope A+D responded with their plan for a
“flexible environment of food, art, culture, and retail within renovated
shipping containers.”
Although city codes lacked precedent for a “temporary” retail
operation lasting more than 90 days (the project is due to expire in 2020),
stakeholders were able to negotiate an agreement such that project became a
reality. Now retail tenants include a mix of established brands and start-ups
taking their first incremental step towards brick and mortars. In addition to
retail offerings, the project hosts film screenings, art installations, and
serves as a performance/event space creating a bonafide neighborhood gathering
place.
What have container
parks like Proxy meant for retail?
Proxy bucks the trend in retail in the sense that in spite
of its positive public reception and the relative success of its tenants, it
plans to shutter in a couple of years. Why remove something that seems to be a
success? Because it was always designed to be a stop-gap and of course the need
to grow the supply of affordable housing in the Bay Area is still an acute need.
But the lessons remain. What Proxy did well was create density in a vacant
space. It was consciously conceived as a means to revitalize a previously
blighted area, a parking lot that had also been the former site of a freeway.
There were other things Proxy did well—curating the mix of tenants in a
meaningful way and targeting operators that could feasibly make the jump to
brick and mortars after a period of incubation. I also appreciate that the
designers consciously eschewed the term “pop-up.” In a quote from Douglas
Burnham, founder of Envelope A+D:
“We specifically don’t use the word ‘pop-up’ because it doesn’t
really mean anything to us anymore…We think that a thoughtful insertion of
compelling temporary uses can be an effective strategy to bring vibrancy to
languishing parts of the city. There’s nothing trendy or faddish about this.”
Admittedly, one could argue it is a bit faddish to treat “pop-up”
as a pejorative term. But I think this gets back to my main takeaway. Before
you critique something for its popularity, it’s important to consider if and
why it actually has staying power.
So…do containers have
staying power?
As far as I’ve been able to tell, the containerization of
our lives continues unabated. Large brands like Budlight, DSW, Puma,
HBO, and HP are increasingly demanding container pop-ups for experiential
retailing strategies while a growing number of companies are supplying both
specialized and turnkey options. They range from Co-Working in a Box’s
“PopBox”, Britten’s “BoxPop”, and Vacant’s mobile container truck, each providing a
range of design and consultative services to help get businesses off the ground
and engage customers in places they didn’t expect.
And let’s not miss the fact that a whole segment of
companies have an identical model for indoor pop-ups. The shopping mall giant Macerich’s
Pop-Up EXP program provides 100-300 SF
of space with micro leases, and modular components. The difference here is we’re
not talking about containers. Again—this suggests a larger trend with momentum
and that the medium (containers) is really beside the point.
What’s on the
horizon?
Some forward-thinking folks have gone so far as to envision
containers as outparcels–parking lot satellites to larger retailers located
inside shopping malls. For example, perhaps a Nordstrom anchoring a mall uses a
container in the parking lot as a small fulfillment center so customers have
the convenience of picking up their order on the fly without the full
commitment of going inside. It’s no stretch of the imagination given the way
e-commerce has pushed the industry towards more rapid and flexible retail with
just-in-time delivery schedules. And what with autonomous vehicles ahead, these trends
will surely continue into the foreseeable future.
Personally, I’m excited to see pop-ups and container
villages keep building off of what has worked in the past. Invest
Atlanta, the City of Atlanta’s Development Authority, approved $550K in
funding to create an “MLK Innovation Village” built out of shipping containers
in an empty parking lot adjacent to the H.E. Holmes MARTA station. The village
will include an outdoor gathering space, retail, and at least nine offices with
the intent that this “semi-temporary” project will be a catalyst for future
transit oriented development in the area. It’s the same model as Proxy and
Re:Start, but with a creative transit component that could give it possibly
massive multiplier effects.
Which is all to say, I think we still have a lot of
containers coming our way in the future.
And that’s quite alright with me.
Puma City Multiple Global Ports |
Re:Start Christchurch, NZ |
Proxy Hayes Valley neighborhood of SF |
Container Park Downtown Las Vegas |